The criticisms of CSR in SMEs cannot be dismissed as the defensive reflex action of selfish businessmen.
The criticisms stem from the pitfalls or shortcomings of the ideology behind CSR as pointed out here.
i. Imposing CSR can lead to imposing inappropriate standards, which will constrain value creation in businesses. This will further lead to business failures and job losses.
ii. As it is, small businesses are struggling for survival. Imposing CSR on them is going to severely affect their viability
iii. The net impact of CSR initiatives in small businesses will be minuscule compared to the effect such initiatives have in large corporate bodies. So, it is better to concentrate on the MNCs and forget about the SMEs.
iv. Many CSR imperatives are dictated by popular opinion and are not necessarily the right things to be done. In such a case, the SME will be striving hard for doing the activities that are not necessarily for the common good.
In order to avoid these criticisms, CSR initiatives must be rooted in certain basic principles, which are discussed here.
i. The CSR programmes must be based on legitimate standards established by civil society, involving a diverse range of stakeholders from businesses, governments, and society, in general.
ii. These should be backed up by well-established processes for measurement and reporting. There should be ways to present the economic, social, and environmental impact of business practices.
iii. These should be built on a strong business case, so that it becomes easy to economically justify the adoption of CSR by companies. This might need putting an incentive mechanism in place.
iv. These must be flexible for companies to innovate and find workable solutions matching their unique situations.
No comments yet.
FAQs
Answer. Critics of Corporate Social Responsibility argue that it is often used as a PR exercise, a strategy for avoiding regulation, and a way to divert attention from real issues, suggesting that societal benefits are frequently outweighed by the company's other harmful practices.
What are the criticisms of corporate social responsibility? ›
Some critics believe that corporate social responsibility can be an exercise in futility. A company's management has a fiduciary duty to its shareholders, and CSR directly opposes this, since the responsibility of executives to shareholders is to maximize profits.
What are the arguments against corporate social responsibility? ›
Arguments Against Social Responsibility
As the money within the business is used in social help, the business increase the cost of their products and services. Lack of Social skills: It is often stated that businessmen don't fully under the social problems and thus can't solve them efficiently.
What are the disadvantages of corporate social responsibility? ›
Disadvantages of CSR
- Financial Costs. One of the primary disadvantages of CSR is the economic burden it imposes on organizations. ...
- Inconsistent Implementation. Ensuring constant CSR practices across an organization may be hard. ...
- Greenwashing. ...
- Measurement Complexity. ...
- Balancing Stakeholder Expectations.
CSR is generally categorized in four ways: environmental responsibility, ethical/human rights responsibility, philanthropic responsibility and economic responsibility.
What do critics of corporate social responsibility frequently argue? ›
Criticisms of Corporate Social Responsibility
The critics often argue that pursuing socially responsible practices is making the overall economy less efficient.
What are the problems with CSR? ›
- 1 Lack of clarity. One of the main challenges that you may encounter is the lack of clarity about what CSR means for your business and how to measure and communicate it. ...
- 2 Limited resources. ...
- 3 Resistance to change. ...
- 4 External challenges. ...
- 5 Lack of innovation. ...
- 6 Lack of recognition. ...
- 7 Here's what else to consider.
Key CSR issues: environmental management, eco-efficiency, responsible sourcing, stakeholder engagement, labour standards and working conditions, employee and community relations, social equity, gender balance, human rights, good governance, and anti-corruption measures.
Why is CSR controversial? ›
Other critics assert that many so-called CSR activities are really just publicity stunts and corporate “greenwashing.” Greenwashing refers to corporations that exaggerate or misstate the impact of their environmental actions or promote products as being “eco-friendly” when in fact they're not.
Which of the following is an argument against corporate social responsibility? ›
An argument against corporate social responsibility is that it imposes unequal costs among competitors. Corporate power refers to: The capability of corporations to influence government, the economy, and society, based on their organizational resources.
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the commitment of businesses to act ethically and contribute to the social and environmental well-being of their stakeholders and communities. However, CSR also involves risks, such as reputation damage, legal liability, stakeholder backlash, or resource depletion.
What are the weakness of social responsibility? ›
The Cons of Embracing Social Responsibility
It may conflict with the goal of maximizing profits. The cost of being socially responsible may be passed on to consumers. Not all businesses have the skills to address social issues effectively. There may be a lack of widespread public support.
What are two barriers to Corporate Social Responsibility? ›
Their findings revealed that there are seven main barriers to CSR, such as additional costs, lack of awareness and knowledge, lack of guidelines and coherent strategy, lack of stakeholder communication, lack of law enforcement, lack of training, and unclear project requirements. Fabrizi et al.
What is an argument against social responsibility? ›
The arguments against Social Responsibility are as follows: 1. Violation of Profit Maximisation Objective: It is considered that social responsibility is against the objective of profit maximisation. But business is an economic activity and its main goal is to earn and maximise profit.
Why is CSR failing? ›
Lack of commitment: Many companies view CSR as a “nice-to-have” rather than a “must-have.” They may not fully commit to implementing CSR strategies and may not allocate sufficient resources to the effort. This lack of commitment can lead to half-hearted efforts that do not have a meaningful impact.
What are the ethical issues in corporate social responsibility? ›
Ethical issues include conflicts of interest, bribes, conflicts of loyalty, and issues of honesty and integrity.
Which of the following is a major shortcoming of corporate social responsibility? ›
CSR has been often criticized for being: kept too much at the periphery of firms' core business; seen as a mere reparation for the negative externalities generated by the business; conceived of as a constraint rather than as a driver for innovation.
What are the risks of corporate social responsibility? ›
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the commitment of businesses to act ethically and contribute to the social and environmental well-being of their stakeholders and communities. However, CSR also involves risks, such as reputation damage, legal liability, stakeholder backlash, or resource depletion.
What are the major arguments for corporate social responsibility? ›
CSR is an argument of economic self-interest for businesses. CSR adds value because it allows companies to reflect the needs and concerns of their various stakeholder groups. By doing so, the firm is more likely to create greater value and, as a result, retain the loyalty of those stakeholders.
